Source: [Department of Economics, Harvard University
>http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/miron/files/budget%202010%20Final.pdf]
February, 2010
Executive Summary
* Government prohibition of drugs is the subject of ongoing debate.
* One issue in this debate is the effect of prohibition on
government budgets. Prohibition entails direct enforcement costs
and prevents taxation of drug production and sale.
* This report examines the budgetary implications of legalizing drugs.
* The report estimates that legalizing drugs would save roughly
$48.7 billion per year in government expenditure on enforcement of
prohibition. $33.1 billion of this savings would accrue to state
and local governments, while $15.6 billion would accrue to the
federal government. Approximately $13.7 billion of the savings
would results from legalization of marijuana, $22.3 billion from
legalization of cocaine and heroin, and $12.8 from legalization of
other drugs.
* The report also estimates that drug legalization would yield tax
revenue of $34.3 billion annually, assuming legal drugs are taxed
at rates comparable to those on alcohol and tobacco. Approximately
$6.4 billion of this revenue would result from legalization of
marijuana, $23.9 billion from legalization of cocaine and heroin,
and $4.0 billion from legalization of other drugs.
* State-by-state breakdowns provide a rough indication of
legalization’s impacts on state budgets, but these estimates are
less reliable than those for the overall economy.
* Whether drug legalization is a desirable policy depends on many
factors other than the budgetary impacts discussed here. Rational
debate about drug policy should nevertheless consider these
budgetary effects.
* The estimates provided here are not definitive estimates of the
budgetary implications of a legalized regime for currently illegal
drugs. The analysis employs assumptions that plausibly err on the
conservative side, but substantial uncertainty remains about the
magnitude of the budgetary impacts.
Creative Commons Attribution