Italy6

Italy – Counter-conference on Drugs: “Let’s stop the war on drugs, let’s guarantee civil and social rights!” 

Counter-conference on Drugs: “Let’s stop the war on drugs, let’s guarantee civil and social rights!” 
Meeting in Rome between 6th and 8th November, over 200 participants reaffirmed the shared commitment towards human rights, people centred drug policy reform, and closer alignment to the responsible regulation of all drugs.
This sentiment was also shared by Mr Zaved Mahmood, human rights advisor at the United Nations. He underlined that national governments are responsible from promoting the full realisation of the right to health and thus including the utilisation of human rights tools to address drug use in society. Mr Mahmood emphasized the centrality of addressing drug policy in its entirety and apply decriminalisation, depenalisation, and regulation tools in tandem with broader social services such as housing, nutrition, and meaningful gainful employment.
The extensive list of speakers, and key messages focused on the importance of inclusivity, dialogue, and concrete action preventing stigma, and restoring dignity to many. Furthermore, all those present agreed on the pivotal importance to place people who use drugs at the helm and centre of all decisions, discussions, and project implementation concerning their lives.
Various speakers expressed concern at a growing wave of the ‘securitisation’ of borders, and a rise in right wing politics and policies. This was recognised as a newfound risk for people who use drugs, especially people already carrying other stigmatised labels such as migrants, gender queer people, and those facing homelessness.
Whilst recognising that the years 2024/2025 have been particularly significant for international drug policy reform, especially when one considers the broken Vienna consensus on the war on drugs, and the inclusion of Harm Reduction in UN resolutions, speakers recognised that the translation of international dialogue into effective national policies will require much more than just diplomacy. This will also be particularly difficult at a regional level when one considers the extensive and significant funding cuts across the EU, including challenging long standing and new found barriers for civil society organisations providing different harm reduction and other services for people who use drugs.
The UN International Guidelines on Human Rights and Drug Policy was recognised and heralded as a key and most significant document to guide governments in developing and sustaining people centred drug policies and laws. Highlighting the current red-flags by the Italian government, in particular the ‘security law – Legge Sicurezza’ and other laws restricting movement, and the assembly of people on the pretext of ‘protecting and preserving public peace’, the speakers warned that this is not only an attack on people who use drugs, but on the democratic principles and processes of the Italian nation and state. In fact, representatives from the association Meglio Legal were arrested just a few hours before. Their sole crime? Trying to peacefully participate to the Government’s own conference on drugs which was held during the same days.
The contro-conference included also testimonials from countries who have recently regulated some form of supply for recreational cannabis use. Mr Andrew Bonello from Malta, and George Wurth from Germany provided a general overview of the legal provisions, including positive and negative measures directly impacting the cannabis reform.
In conclusion, the contro-conference recognised the centrality of grass-roots movements in advancing the rights of people who use drugs, and ensure government, policies, and social institutions fulfil their role in  advancing human rights for all.
This conference included the participation of the following partners:  
– Forum Droghe
– ITARDD
– ENCOD – European Coalition for Just and Effective Drug Policies
– United Nations Office for Human Rights
– United Nations Special Rapporteur for Health
– International Drug Policy Consortium
– European Drug Policy Alliance
– EuroNPUD, ItalNPUD
– Harm reduction International
– C-European Harm Reduction Network
– Youth Rise
– Metzineres
– European Union Drugs Agency
– Associazione Luca Coscioni
– Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies
– Psychedelic Access Research European Alliance
– Psychedelicare.eu
– CNCA
– Associazione Antigone
– CGIL
– Meglio Legale
– German Hemp Association
– ReLeaf Malta
Rete degli Studenti

Cannabis growers as gardeners: results from a survey among Italian and British small-scale growers

In the last issue of the International Journal of Drug Policy

Volume 144, Part 3, October 2025, 104959, we can read this very interesting analysis of a survey.

 

Cannabis growers as gardeners: results from a survey among Italian and British small-scale growers

Background

The horticultural nature of growing cannabis is often overlooked in the study of cannabis production, and subsequent policies. Little is known about whether growers’ horticultural expertise influences cannabis cultivation methods, the growing of other psychoactive plants, substance use behaviors, or interactions with the criminal justice system. The trajectory of cultivation, in terms of whether cannabis is a gateway to more general gardening, or vice versa, is also unexplored. Studying individuals who combine cannabis cultivation with other gardening activities is valuable because it provides insights into the motivations and practices of cannabis growers as illegal drug market participants.

Methods

Data from 1302 small-scale cannabis growers in Italy and the UK was collected through an online survey from 2020 to 2021. We ran two regressions to compare (1) those who only grow cannabis with those who also grow other plants and; (2) those who started growing cannabis and then grew other plants and vice versa.

Results

Most people in our sample grew cannabis and other plants (General Gardeners; 82 %). In comparison with the Only-cannabis group (OCG), General Gardeners (GG) tended to be older, more educated, and more likely to be in a relationship. GG grew more cannabis crops outdoors, and the purposes for growing were more related to ecological or medical reasons rather than selling cannabis. The OCG group had higher odds of using stimulant drugs and meeting cannabis use dependence criteria compared to GG. Among GG, the majority (71 %) started growing other plants and later moved to cannabis.

Conclusion

Gardening other plants is common among cannabis growers and precedes cultivating cannabis far more than the reverse pathway. As general gardeners appear focused on cannabis alone, concerns about spillover to growing other psychoactive plants or fungi may be overstated. Given the lower expected harms associated with general gardening, it could serve as a proxy for reduced supply involvement in legal assessments.